About Stucco - European Stucco
Composition of Historic Stucco
Before the mid-to-late nineteenth century, stucco consisted primarily of hydrated or slaked lime,
water and sand, with straw or animal hair included as a binder.
Natural cements were frequently used
in stucco mixes after their discovery in the United States during the 1820's. Portland cement was first
manufactured in the United States in 1871, and it gradually replaced natural cement. After about 1900,
most stucco was composed primarily of portland cement, mixed with some lime. With the addition of
portland cement, stucco became even more versatile and durable. No longer used just as a coating for
a substantial material like masonry or log, stucco could now be applied over wood or metal lath
attached to a light wood frame. With this increased strength, stucco ceased to be just a veneer
and became a more integral part of the building structure.
Today, gypsum, which is
hydrated calcium sulfate or sulfate of lime, has to a great extent replaced
lime Gypsum is preferred because it hardens faster and has less shrinkage than lime. Lime is generally
used only in the finish coat in contemporary stucco work.
The composition of stucco depended on local custom and available materials. Stucco often contained
substantial amounts of mud or
clay,
marble or
brick dust, or even
sawdust, and an array of additives
ranging from animal blood or urine, to eggs, keratin or gluesize (animal hooves and horns), varnish,
wheat paste, sugar, salt, sodium silicate, alum, tallow, linseed oil, beeswax, and wine, beer, or rye
whiskey. Waxes, fats and oils were included to introduce water-repellent properties, sugary materials
reduced the amount of water needed and slowed down the setting time, and alcohol acted as an air
entrainer. All of these additives contributed to the strength and durability of the stucco.
The appearance of much stucco was determined by the color of the sand--or sometimes burnt clay, used
in the mix, but often stucco was also tinted with natural pigments, or the surface whitewashed or
color-washed after stuccoing was completed. Brick dust could provide color, and other coloring
materials that were not affected by lime, mostly mineral pigments, could be added to the mix for
the final finish coat. Stucco was also marbled or marbleized--stained to look like stone by diluting
oil of vitriol (sulfuric acid) with water, and mixing this with a yellow ochre, or another color.
As the twentieth century progressed, manufactured or synthetic pigments were added at the factory
to some prepared stucco mixes.
Methods of Application
Stucco is applied directly, without lath, to masonry substrates such as
brick,
stone,
concrete or
hollow tile. But on wood structures, stucco, like its
interior counterpart plaster, must be applied
over lath in order to obtain an adequate key to hold the stucco. Thus, when applied over a log
structure, stucco is laid on horizontal wood lath that has been nailed on vertical wood furring
strips attached to the logs. If it is applied over a
wood frame structure, stucco may be applied
to wood or metal lath nailed directly to the wood frame; it may also be placed on lath that has
been attached to furring strips. The furring strips are themselves laid over building paper
covering the wood sheathing. Wood lath was gradually superseded by expanded metal lath introduced
in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century. When stuccoing over a stone or brick substrate,
it was customary to cut back or rake out the mortar joints if they were not already recessed by
natural weathering or erosion, and sometimes the bricks themselves were gouged to provide a key
for the stucco. This helped provide the necessary bond for the stucco to remain attached to the
masonry, much like the key provided by wood or metal lath on
frame buildings.
Like
interior wall plaster, stucco has traditionally been applied as a
multiple-layer process,
sometimes consisting of two coats, but more commonly as three. Whether applied directly to a
masonry substrate or onto wood or metal lath, this consists of a first "
scratch" or "
pricking-up"
coat, followed by a second scratch coat, sometimes referred to as a "floating" or "brown" coat,
followed finally by the "finishing" coat. Up until the late-nineteenth century, the first and the
second coats were of much the same composition, generally consisting of lime, or natural cement,
sand, perhaps clay, and one or more of the additives previously mentioned. Straw or animal hair
was usually added to the first coat as a binder. The third, or finishing coat, consisted primarily
of a very fine mesh grade of lime and sand, and sometimes pigment. As already noted, after the
1820's, natural cement was also a common ingredient in stucco until it was replaced by portland cement.
Both masonry and wood lath must be kept wet or damp to ensure a good bond with the stucco.
Wetting these materials helps to prevent them from pulling moisture out of the stucco too
rapidly, which results in cracking, loss of bond, and generally poor quality stuccowork.
Traditional Stucco Finishes
Until the early-twentieth century when a variety of novelty finishes or textures were introduced,
the last coat of stucco was commonly given a smooth, troweled finish, and then scored or lined in
imitation of ashlar. The illusion of masonry joints was sometimes enhanced by a thin line of white
lime putty, graphite, or some other pigment. Some nineteenth century buildings feature a water table
or raised foundation of roughcast stucco that differentiates it from the stucco surface above, which
is smooth and scored. Other novelty or textured finishes associated with the "period" or revival
styles of the early-twentieth century include: the English cottage finish, adobe and Spanish,
pebble-dashed or dry-dash surface, fan and sponge texture, reticulated and vermiculated,
roughcast (or wet dash), and sgraffito.